|
Day 3
May 8, 2012 21:58:38 GMT -8
Post by capfalcon on May 8, 2012 21:58:38 GMT -8
I think the two people up at bat today are Corvidae or Schuss.
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 0:10:15 GMT -8
Post by slym on May 9, 2012 0:10:15 GMT -8
I think immediately trying to narrow it down to two people without actually voting for one of them is really suspicious.
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 4:46:44 GMT -8
Post by smooveop on May 9, 2012 4:46:44 GMT -8
Well, unless Schuss comes up with a good explanation, or he eats the village vote, I'm sticking with that.
What's the Corvidae reasoning?
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 5:34:29 GMT -8
Post by warban on May 9, 2012 5:34:29 GMT -8
What's recap on what schuss?
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 8:00:11 GMT -8
Post by smooveop on May 9, 2012 8:00:11 GMT -8
Shuss claimed he was roleblocked on day 1. He should not have been able to have been roleblocked on day 1 according to what we know of the padawan roleblock. It doesn't make much sense that Sith would have a roleblock power in ADDITION to the padawan's roleblock. So it looks like Schuss is lyng.
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 8:02:31 GMT -8
Post by warban on May 9, 2012 8:02:31 GMT -8
Hmm. Who was he targeting with his seering?
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 8:03:05 GMT -8
Post by warban on May 9, 2012 8:03:05 GMT -8
Schuss
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 10:06:42 GMT -8
Post by capfalcon on May 9, 2012 10:06:42 GMT -8
I think immediately trying to narrow it down to two people without actually voting for one of them is really suspicious. Sorry. It was late, and I wanted to write down my train of thought before I went to bed. I also wanted to wait and see how the wagons were looking the next day, because I didn't want to keep flopping my vote around like I did yesterday. Anyway, the reason for Schuss was stated, but I seemed to think that Corvidae had more people voting for him yesterday. However, it looks like he only had one. Don't really know why that stuck with me. So, yeah. My bad about that.
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 10:44:53 GMT -8
Post by slym on May 9, 2012 10:44:53 GMT -8
I think it's time to get rid of either Kime or T_A. But I doubt any of you will go along with it
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 11:40:56 GMT -8
Post by capfalcon on May 9, 2012 11:40:56 GMT -8
Why Kime or T_A?
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 11:52:24 GMT -8
Post by smooveop on May 9, 2012 11:52:24 GMT -8
I'm always for voting Kime, but something about Schuss being roleblocked on day 1 seems really off. IF a day 1 roleblock existed, why would someone use it on a Padawan?
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 12:21:51 GMT -8
Post by ketbra on May 9, 2012 12:21:51 GMT -8
Okay gonna go for Schuss if the roleblock thing still hasn't been resolved
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 12:43:08 GMT -8
Post by smooveop on May 9, 2012 12:43:08 GMT -8
Schuss addressed it by posting what he claimed to be a PM from Obi. If true, (1) he should not have posted it per phalla rules, (2) I still register my disconcert at a day 1 roleblock targeting a padawan. If not true, than he is sithidy-sith-sith.
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 16:31:12 GMT -8
Post by ketbra on May 9, 2012 16:31:12 GMT -8
I've received reliable word that Infidel[/color] is highly likely to be mafia. (this is what jdark thinks anyways, and Akimbo seemed to trust Akimbo)
|
|
|
Day 3
May 9, 2012 16:47:59 GMT -8
Post by capfalcon on May 9, 2012 16:47:59 GMT -8
Does Jdark have a reason? Did he seer as sith or something?
|
|